TESTING THE FUNDAMENTAL ASSUMPTION UNDERLYING THE USE OF LTRMP FISH DATA: DOES VARIATION IN LTRMP CPUE DATA REFLECT VARIATION IN THE ABUNDANCE OF FISHES John H. Chick1, Chad R. Dolan1, Eric N. Ratcliff1, Eric J. Gittinger1, Valerie A. Barko2 and Brian S. Ickes3 1Illinois Natural History Survey, Great Rivers Field Station, 8450 Montclair Ave, Brighton, IL 62012 2Missouri Department of conservation, Open River and Wetlands Field Station, 3815 E. Jackson Blvd., Jackson, MO 63755 3U. S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, 2630 Fanta Reed Raod, La Crosse, WI 54603 Most of the techniques available for sampling fishes, including all those used in the Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP), provide catch-per- unit-effort data as an indicator of abundance. An underlying assumption of the use of CPUE data is that a relationship exists between CPUE and the actual abundance (numbers of biomass per unit area) of fishes. In general, the relation between CPUE and abundance is depicted as a linear relationship of the form: C/E = qN Where: C/E = catch per unit effort for a particular species N = is the true abundance (i.e., number per area) for that species, and q = is the gear-specific catchability coefficient. We test for relationships between CPUE data from LTRMP day electrofishing with density estimates from block-net rotenone sampling in backwater habitats. The project was conducted at two reaches of the UMRS: 1) Pool 26, and 3) the La Grange Reach of the Illinois River. At each reach, multiple backwater lakes were selected for sampling based on a minimum size of 5 hectares and sufficient depth to allow sampling. Within each backwater, three ¼ acre block nets were be deployed in random locations, and fish within the nets were sampled using rotenone. Potassium permanganate was applied outside of the nets to deactivate rotenone leaking through the mesh. On the same day the three block nets were deployed, three day electrofishing samples were made at random locations following standard LTRMP methodology. This allowed us to use regression analysis to test for a linear relationship between CPUE from day electrofishing with density and biomass estimates from block net sampling, using each backwater lake as replicates. Keywords: fish sampling, day electrofishing, Long Term Resource Monitoring Program, backwater lakes, Mississippi and Illinois rivers 1. John H. Chick, Illinois Natural History Survey, Great Rivers Field Station, 8450 Montclair Ave, Brighton, IL 62012; Phone (618)466-9690, Fax (618)466-9688, email chick@inhs.uiuc.edu 2. Platform presentation, will NOT change to poster 3. No student authors