AN ESTIMATE OF LIGHT AVAILABILITY FOR AQUATIC VEGETATION IN POOLS 4, 8, 13, AND 26 OF THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER FROM 1993 to 1999. Dennis M. Wasley1,2, James T. Rogala1, and David M. Soballe1 1U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI 54603. 2University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601 Dramatic fluctuations in abundance of submersed aquatic vegetation across the Upper Mississippi River System (UMRS) from the late 1980's to present have been the subject of several studies and wide speculation. Management actions have been proposed and implemented (e.g. large-scale water level reductions in Pool 8) in an attempt to enhance aquatic and semi-aquatic vegetation in the system, but the underlying causes for long-term changes in aquatic vegetation in the UMRS are not established. Light availability from May through September, the primary growing season, is one factor that often limits the growth of submersed vegetation. This is especially true in turbid river systems such as the UMRS where concentrations of plant nutrients appear to be present in excess, but light penetration is restricted by suspended materials in the water. Detailed information on water clarity or light availability in broad areas of the UMRS was not collected prior to the implementation of the Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP, ca 1990) and statistically reliable, pool-scale information on aquatic plant abundance across the system was not collected prior to1999. Nonetheless, we believed that it might be possible to use existing information to estimate (model) the light regime in the UMRS for the past 10 - 20 years. We used data from LTRMP stratified random sampling, LTRMP bathymetric surveys, and long-term stage and discharge records from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to estimate the areal extent of illuminated substrate for Pools 4, 8, 13 and 26 of the UMRS. Our estimates suggest an increase from 1993 to 1999 when aquatic plants were also increasing. Among pools we found substantial differences in substrate illumination that were driven by differences in pool morphology and a general downstream increase in turbidity within the UMRS. These differences in illumination seem to correspond well with among-pool differences in aquatic vegetation. We found weak relations in the UMRS between water clarity and factors such as month, river stage, and tributary discharge and the relations among these variables may not be helpful for broad scale modeling of light availability in this system. Keywords: Mississippi River, submersed vegetation, turbidity, light, secchi depth